翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ City of London Imperial Volunteers
・ City of London Investment Trust
・ City of London market constabularies
・ City of London Militia Act 1662
・ City of London Pedway Scheme
・ City of London Police
・ City of London Rifles
・ City of London School
・ City of London School for Girls
・ City of London Sinfonia
・ City of London Solicitors' Company
・ City of London Yeomanry (Rough Riders)
・ City of Golden Shadow
・ City of Gosford
・ City of Gosnells
City of Gotha and Federal Republic of Germany v. Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A.
・ City of Granada Orchestra
・ City of Greater Bendigo
・ City of Greater Dandenong
・ City of Greater Geelong
・ City of Greater Geraldton
・ City of Greater New York
・ City of Greater Shepparton
・ City of Greater Taree
・ City of Griffith
・ City of Groton, Connecticut
・ City of Gympie
・ City of Hamilton
・ City of Hamilton (Victoria)
・ City of Hamilton EMS


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

City of Gotha and Federal Republic of Germany v. Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A. : ウィキペディア英語版
City of Gotha and Federal Republic of Germany v. Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A.
The City of Gotha and Federal Republic of Germany v. Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A. was a September 1998 case in the High Court of England and Wales involving the ownership of a Joachim Wtewael painting. The case was the first reported court decision on section 221 of the German Civil Code (Burgerliches Gesetzbuch). This section involves the limitation of proprietary actions when a third party has acquired possession of the property.〔''City of Gotha and Federal Republic of Germany v. Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A.'' ()〕 The case is important in regards to the concepts of statutes of limitation and acquisitive prescription.〔Muller-Katzenburg, "Possession and Ownership of Stolen or Otherwise Lost Works of Art" in Prott, Lyndel V.,eds, ''Witnesses to History: A Compendium of Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects ''(Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, 2009) at 315. ()〕

==Procedural History==

The case was a consolidation between an action brought by the City of Gotha against Sotheby's and an action brought by Federal Republic of Germany against Cobert Finance S.A.〔Supra note 1()〕
The Federal Republic of Germany and the city of Gotha both claim ownership of the painting and claim that Cobert converted the painting by "taking constructive delivery of it March 1989, by consigning it to Sotheby's for sale at that time, by offering it for sale through Sotheby's to the City of Gotha in October 1991 and/or by demanding its return from Sotheby's in August 1993".〔Ibid〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「City of Gotha and Federal Republic of Germany v. Sotheby's and Cobert Finance S.A.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.